Google
 


Subscribe to The Tech Night Owl Newsletter

*Required



Archive for the 'Newsletter' Category


Newsletter Issue #467

Sunday, November 9th, 2008

THIS WEEK’S TECH NIGHT OWL LIVE RADIO UPDATE

I have a fairly large collection of keyboards and other input devices, mostly mice of various configurations, which I’ve accumulated over the years. Whenever I feel tempted to sell them, or simply pass them off to a family member or friend, I begin to wonder whether I might actually need them. So I hold off.

You see, unlike some of you, I don’t just stick with the same keyboard and mouse year after year. I change from time to time, sometimes just to test a new product, but most often because I decide I’d rather try a new approach. That’s just me.

However, I’ve never been enamored of trackballs, even though I tried early on to become accustomed to the venerable Kensington TurboMouse. After I persevered for nearly a year, I decided that I had better things to do than force myself to endure ongoing discomfort, and so I returned to a standard mouse. These days, I don’t use Apple’s standard accessories at all. I will detail my current preferences a little later.

In any case, on this week’s episode of The Tech Night Owl LIVEMacworld Editorial Director Jason Snell joined us to talk about choosing the best keyboard and mouse for your computer. You also heard his views on the features Apple dropped from the new MacBook, such as FireWire, and the fact that you can only get the latest Mac notebooks with glossy screens.

A long-time TV aficionado, Jason also delivered his fearless views on questionable the state of the current TV season and about some standout shows. Indeed, though ratings continue to slide, there are actually some pretty decent programs to be found, if you’re willing to take the time to sample them. Just check your TV listings and be open minded.

Prolific author and commentator Joe Kissell was on hand to talk about the good, bad and ugly aspects of Apple’s MobileMe Web services. You’ll then heard his latest insights on choosing the best backup solution for your Mac.

On The Paracast this week, Bill Birnes, from The History Channel’s “UFO Hunters” TV series and “UFO Magazine,” delivers new information about Philip Corso, insights into UFOs from time and space, and revelations about ongoing government conspiracy theories. And discover why David walked out in anger during the episode.

Coming November 16: Meet an authentic Roswell witness and American hero, Dr. Jesse Marcel Jr., author of “The Roswell Legacy,” where he tells you how he handled materials from the fabled crash when he was a child. You’ll also hear from listener Mike Clelland, a UFO experiencer, who will recount some of his weird close encounters of the UFO kind.

IS IT TIME TO DITCH DESKTOPS FOR GOOD?

For better or worse, Apple is often way ahead of the curve when it comes to anticipating industry trends. Sometimes it’s even responsible for those new directions.

Take the AirPort, which arrived at the very beginning of the wireless networking revolution. Today, pretty much every notebook computer has Wi-Fi capability, and it’s also available on many desktops, although sometimes strictly as an option.

Even though Apple invented FireWire, they were also responsible for taking the nascent USB format and giving it credibility beginning with the iMac. Although they originally got plenty of lumps for ditching ADB for input devices and LocalTalk for printers and such, readily-available adapters came out to handle legacy devices. The rest of us quickly adapted.

These days, some suggest that the desktop computer itself is probably an endangered species. Indeed, over 50% of the new personal computers sold are portable. Apple, however, anticipated that trend, too, and the MacBook, MacBook Air and MacBook Pro, together, amount for over 60% of Mac hardware sales.

In a sense, Apple has been in the forefront of all-in-one personal computers from the get-go. The first Mac had this form factor, although it was hardly a portable, and you still needed a separate keyboard and mouse. It’s present-day successor, the iMac, continues that tradition, and continues to deliver great profits for the company.

But the real action is in the notebook sector. That’s where Apple seems to have placed the lion’s share of its product development cash, what with the unibody that has taken over the entire line, except for the legacy white MacBook and the 17-inch MacBook Pro. But the latter will probably get a major upgrade in the not-too-distant future, perhaps at Macworld 2009 in January.

Portables also influence most of today’s Mac desktops. The Mac mini was always based on parts from the MacBook, although now they’re from a much older version, because the mini line hasn’t been refreshed since 2007. The iMac more closely resembled the MacBook Pro, and will likely incorporate chipsets similar to the current model in the next revision.

Only the Mac Pro, which is actually regarded as a workstation rather than a personal computer, exists in a world by itself, with parts exclusive to the line.

So where does Apple take us next? Well, today’s notebook computer is a powerful beast, with performance that closely matches desktops. It’s more than enough for most of you. Indeed, a MacBook Pro is a regular visitor on a movie set, often used for sound capture and final video editing chores.

If you must have a bigger display, no problem. Just connect the one you want, even the 30-inch “dual link” variety typified by the best displays from Apple and even Dell, and nothing prevents you from using a separate keyboard and mouse. So why do you even need a second computer?

Indeed, just as more and more people are abandoning their landlines for wireless phones, I expect that many of you rely on a notebook for all your personal computing chores. I know my son does. His black MacBook, of Early 2008 vintage, has traveled with him not only throughout the U.S., but to his current home in Spain. He finds it perfect for every task for which he depends on a computer, and has never once considered a desktop alternative, or even a larger display for that matter.

I would not be surprised to see the portable segment exceed 75% of the market and desktops become consigned more and more to specific niche functions. They will continue to serve duty in dedicated office environments and for high-end content creators. Even then, as quad-core processors become commonplace on notebooks, I expect that Mac Pro customers might similarly diminish in number.

For me, I suppose I’d be disappointed, because I actually prefer desktops, large screens — the whole nine yards! Of course, my MacBook Pro is faster than anything I’ve ever used before, except for the Mac Pro that sits below my main computer desktop. On the other hand, the next great processor revision will perhaps eliminate my need for a desktop computer altogether.

Despite my reservations, that time is close at hand, and it may indeed happen in the next year or two.

For the rest of you, I expect the transition might be a whole lot quicker. You see, some habits are hard to break. The first Mac I brought into my home office was an expandable desktop model (I used the all-in-one versions at the office). While the facts are otherwise, I still have that emotional commitment to the way things used to be. But I am not rigid in my beliefs — not by a long shot.

THE NIGHT OWL’S LATE 2008 TOOLBOX

I know that most of you probably don’t care a whit about the hardware I use for my daily work. Some of you might, however, find it useful in the event your requirements are similar to mind. Rest assured, I don’t think I necessarily have anything to boast about.

As I you know, I produce two online radio shows every week, so audio hardware is of paramount importance. So it rates at the forefront of my equipment collection.

First comes microphones. True, my MacBook Pro has a built-on mic, but it’s definitely not suitable for professional broadcasting, although it’ll work in a pinch. Instead, I continue to use a pair of Shure SM58s, which are rugged dynamic mics tailored for both speech and vocal use. For my purposes, they are both mounted on regular tabletop stands, and I use large windscreens to reduce popping effects.

The main audio mixer is a Mackie DFX-6, which replaces the Yamaha I previously used for no reason other than it seems to sound better, and appears more rugged. It has four standard inputs, plus a few studio effects that I seldom use. As with the previous mixer, it has slider switches, which ensure quiet operation. When we stream the shows, the output from the Mackie passes through a Behringer Model MDX2600 audio processor, which cleans up sound from sometimes inferior sources, such as a mobile phone, and delivers maximum talk power. This may be a simple arrangement compared to a traditional radio station, but it gets the job done.

I still have a JK Audio digital hybrid processor, which is designed to handle phone calls, but these days, I can do as well or better with Skype.

For remote recording, I continue to use that Native Instruments Audio Kontrol 1 USB mixer, plus a Blue Snow mic.

There is yet another piece of hardware that’s critical to this company’s operations, and that’s a SuperMicro server, running a version of Linux known as CentOS Enterprise, which is located at a datacenter in Virginia, near Washington, D.C., in a cage owned by HostICan. Site management comes courtesy of two related applications, known as WHM and cPanel. I stream the audio with Apple’s Darwin Streaming Server 6.0.3, the open source version of QuickTime Streaming Server. The live broadcast is fed to the server across a broadband Internet connection from my Mac Pro, courtesy of QuickTime Broadcaster.

You may wonder why the server isn’t a Mac, and that’s a good question. However, the easy answer is that Linux servers are still less expensive in most hosting environments, largely because of heavy competition and a rich selection of lower cost hardware. While the Apple Xserve is a powerful product that is fully competitive with servers from other makers of equal specs, there is a far smaller selection of Web hosts that are Mac-specific. Hence there is less price competition. Maybe that’ll change, and we’ll change too when that happens.

On to the software side, original audio is captured by Ambrosia Software’s WireTap Studio 1.0.6. Although it has its own waveform editor, I actually prefer Bias Peak Pro 6.0.3, which is a great two-channel audio application. For multiple channel mixdowns, I generally use a shareware product, Amadeus Pro.

Our Web sites are built and maintained with several tools. This site is mostly done with WordPress, perhaps the most popular blogging tool on the planet. The text editor in Transmit, my favorite FTP application, serves duty for basic editing, and I also use Adobe Dreamweaver CS4.

For pure writing, Microsoft Word 2008 still tackles the job efficiently. Maybe it’s bloated and prone to occasional crashes, but I got used to Word way back in the late 1980s, and I haven’t seen a compelling reason to switch. That doesn’t man there aren’t equal or superior third-party solutions. But my word processing tasks tend to be fairly basic.

I still stick with Apple Mail, largely because the alternatives are buggier. My primary browser is Safari, both the Mac and Windows versions, but I still check the sites with Firefox, Opera and, yes, Internet Explorer under Windows Vista. I do my best to make sure that the sites render properly most everywhere.

The final part of the toolbox is my Mac hardware lineup. The display remains that 30-inch Dell 3007-WFPHC, which delivers brilliant color and excellent sharpness. But now that Apple has resumed display development with the 24-inch LED Cinema Display, I have hopes for a forthcoming 30-inch version that’ll be a standout in the marketplace. Maybe next year.

My main work computer is an Early 2008 Mac Pro, equipped with the standard pair of 2.8GHz Quad-Core Xeon processors, and 16GB of RAM. Most of the RAM comes from third parties, because Apple’s own chips are way overpriced. Internally, the Mac Pro sports a pair of 500GB Western Digital hard drives (the second used for daily clone backups with Shirt Pocket’s SuperDuper!). The graphics card is the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT. A second backup regimen, using Time Capsule, goes to a 1TB Time Capsule.

On the notebook side of the ledger, I use an Early 2008 17-inch MacBook Pro maxed out with 4GB RAM and a 16GB iPhone 3G. While I was originally skeptical about the need for an iPhone, it’s now almost always at my side and indispensable. Yes, I am addicted to the wired generation and it’s hard to imagine life for any period of time without Internet access.

That is, until today’s Internet is replaced with something better.

THE FINAL WORD

The Tech Night Owl Newsletter is a weekly information service of Making The Impossible, Inc.

Publisher/Editor: Gene Steinberg
Managing Editor: Grayson Steinberg
Marketing and Public Relations: Barbara Kaplan
Worldwide Licensing and Marketing: Sharon Jarvis

Related Issues:


Newsletter Issue #466

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

THIS WEEK’S TECH NIGHT OWL LIVE RADIO UPDATE

So who did ignite the personal computer revolution? Well, most of you know that Apple was a major force in the industry dating back to the 1970s, yet some want to convey the impression that Microsoft was the real innovator, and that the original IBM PC came first, even though it didn’t appear until the early 1980s?

Well on this week’s episode of The Tech Night Owl LIVE, we returned to “The David Biedny Zone” to set the record straight, as our Special Correspondent presented an insightful look at the real history of personal computers, not the fake version foisted upon us by Microsoft and some unsuspecting tech writers.

Macworld Senior Editor Rob Griffiths was in full rant mode in this episode, as he explained why he doesn’t like the glossy screens on the iMac and the latest Mac notebooks. He also presented his top ten pet peeves about Mac OS X Leopard.

Now, I bet if you have used Leopard for a year, as he has, you have your own expanding list of rants and raves. But I think you’ll agree that Rob was right on track with many of his complaints.

Our second journey through history featured John Larish, author of “Silver to Silicon,” a fascinating voyage to discover the progression of the photographic industry from roll film to all-digital.

You may not recall that Apple was one of the early pioneers in affordable digital photography, with its QuickTake cameras. However, those products were actually built by Kodak. That, and a whole lot more, was discussed by John during this fascinating segment.

On The Paracast this week, the “Culture of Ufology” is explored by veteran UFO author and publisher Tim “Mr. UFO” Beckley, experiencer Jeremy Vaeni, and your outspoken Paracast crew. Do UFO conferences help advance research or are they just entertainment and little more?

Coming November 9: Bill Birnes, from The History Channel’s “UFO Hunters” TV series and “UFO Magazine,” delivers new information about Philip Corso, insights into UFOs from time and space, and revelations about ongoing government conspiracy theories.

A HARD LOOK AT SOME OF APPLE’S DESIGN MISTAKES

Some of the folks who bash Apple, unfortunately, do it based on erroneous assumptions. Take the claim that Macs are overpriced, or that there’s an Apple Tax of some sort that you pay for the privilege of buying a computer that just works. In fact, if you actually configure a Mac and a PC as closely as possible — from hardware to the bundled software, including the equivalent Vista version, which is Ultimate — the prices are really quite close.

But it’s also true that Apple does make its share of mistakes. Sometimes it learns from them, sometimes it doesn’t. One example might perhaps be the transition to glossy screens, which has made some of you absolutely scream! Now maybe they’re cheaper, maybe they are more environmentally friendly. But what about just using some sort of anti-reflective coating? Wouldn’t that answer at least some of the complaints?

I don’t pretend to know the manufacturing obstacles involved. I’m just asking

But I also think there have been ongoing decisions that, while they may have certain side benefits to Apple in terms of a smooth form factor, do not make sense from the point of practicality. I’m sure there are logical design considerations as to why these things were done, and that some of you will explain them to me. In the meantime, let me tell you what personally upsets me.

Take the Eject button on a Mac’s optical drive. No, not the dedicated one on your Apple keyboard, or the alternative on a third-party product. No, my friends, I’m talking about the one you will no longer find on your Mac. All right, maybe that little “bump” won’t look so pretty on an Apple notebook, an iMac or a Mac mini. But on the Mac Pro? Does it really matter?

Besides, I’m sure Jonathan Ive and the rest of Apple’s positively brilliant designers can conceive of a recessed button that will get the job done and not seriously detract from your Mac’s looks.

Under normal circumstances, of course, the keyboard alternative and pressing the mouse button at startup will generally get the job done and activate the function. But sometimes the action fails, because your input device is broken, or, during startup, when the third-party input drivers (usually with wireless devices) load too late. I see situations where it would be more convenient to have an Eject button on the drive itself. Apple doesn’t.

You know that the new MacBook Pro is fitted with a single FireWire 800 port. That’s the fastest available FireWire standard available now, though a faster one is under construction. You can use your FireWire 400 devices, such as a camcorder with an adapter. But that adapter comes at an extra cost, roughly $15 or thereabouts, and having a slower device on the same port also slows down a faster one.

Now paying another $15 for an adapter plug is no big deal after you’ve spent upwards of $2,000 on a new notebook computer, but why should it be necessary? Does Apple truly save that much money by omitting a second port for the slower FireWire protocol?

That takes us, of course, to the loss of FireWire on the regular MacBook. Steve Jobs feels that it shouldn’t matter, since today’s camcorders mostly support USB 2.0. But if you have an older camcorder, what do you do then, other than buy a MacBook Pro, or the white MacBook? Is this really a marketing decision to differentiate the regular model from the Pro alternative? The MacBook Pro does offer a bigger screen, ExpressCard 34 slot and twin graphic chips. Isn’t that sufficient?

Evidently not.

To be fair, Apple did listen to demands to make it easier to replace hard drives on the MacBook Pro. That’s certainly a positive development. At the same time, what about the iMac? Will the expected refreshed version make the process easier? Certainly Apple has a larger container for its parts; hence, more working area to make this parts swap a simple process.

That, of course, takes us to the poor, neglected Mac mini. Ever since I made my public plea for Apple to upgrade the mini and address some of its design shortcomings, a number of you wrote that this diminutive Mac remains popular in education, as entry-level Web servers and in other market segments that, one hopes, give Apple sufficient reason to keep it production.

For the next version, if there is one of course, I would hope Apple will seriously consider making it simple to snap off the bottom cover, so you can easily get to the RAM and hard drive.

Remember that when Apple makes it hard for you to do routine parts replacements, it may help the dealer in terms of giving them more service-related income. But the more complicated the installation process, the easier it is to make a mistake, and service people, even though they may be highly skilled and carefully trained, aren’t perfect. Do you think they enjoy picking apart a Mac mini for an upgrade or repair?

That takes us to the last entrant in my little rant list, and that’s the iPhone. Apple’s various firmware updates have pretty much eliminated most of the connection issues I’ve encountered. Part of that, of course, might be the result of AT&T improving the quality of its 3G network in my area, and I hope it’s better in your city too.

But for a smartphone that aspires to become an appliance for the enterprise, Apple has to rethink the battery replacement scheme. Forget about a dead battery. Consider a spent one, where you only have minutes left and you’re not near a power outlet (home, office or motor vehicle). What do you do then? You can’t very well remove the battery and install a spare, as you can even with the free wireless handsets your mobile carrier offers. Certainly there are expansion batteries you can attach to the iPhone, and there are good ones, although they make for a thicker or longer object for you to lug around.

For the next iPhone, Apple ought to seriously consider compromising for once on such matters. I’m sure there’s a way to craft a removable battery cover without seriously denigrating the iPhone’s looks. Apple has the best and the brightest, and I just know they can come up with a credible solution.

Beyond this tiny list, I’m sure you readers can double and triple the size without breaking a sweat. Whether Apple will listen is another thing entirely.

THE NIGHT OWL’S HOPES AND DREAMS ABOUT BLU-RAY

The conventional wisdom, such as it is, has it that the prolonged battle for supremacy for high definition DVD formats took a far greater toll than the consumer electronics makers and movie studios expected. Even though Blu-ray emerged the victor early his year in the battle to the death against HD-DVD, it came too late to save that format for the long haul.

What that means, if you believe what they tell you, is that online downloads of HD content will quickly replace DVDs even before the format gains genuine traction. Already you are hearing dire predictions that holiday sales of Blu-ray players will be pitiful, even though pricing will begin at around $150.

Now I suppose any consumer electronic gadget will have difficulty, considering the shaky state of the world economy. It’s really hard to find any optimistic expectations from any company, though it does seem that Apple is trying real hard to maintain a stiff upper lip in light of diminished expectations for what would normally be a blow-out quarter.

At $150, though, why would Blu-ray fail? Well, the problem is that you can get a perfectly good up-converting DVD player for $100 less, and the argument for paying more money is one that’s very difficult to make. Sure, Blu-ray has genuine 1080p picture resolution and a growing number of even lower-priced flat panel TVs offer the capability of reproducing all of it on their large screens.

However, when you watch the pseudo high definition picture from an upconverting player at a normal viewing distance, it comes really close to Blu-ray. Sure, you may not get some of the fancy extras, but I think most people don’t really care. They just want a clear picture with great sound, and both are capabile of delivering the goods.

Did I say “really close?” Well, an upconverting DVD player uses digital tricks to make a standard definition picture look sharper. If you look carefully and are situated a couple of feet from your TV, you can probably see more digital artifacts on the screen, particularly when you compare it to the pristine image from a typical Blu-ray deck.

But most of you don’t watch TVs that close. I know I don’t. Just the other day, in fact, I saw the aging Harrison Ford demonstrate he hasn’t lost his action movie chops in “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.” I bought the two-DVD special in Blu-ray, and it’s clear they did a wonderful transfer.

That evening, the Steinberg family viewed an episode from a DVD collection of the second season of Fox TV’s “House,” one of our network favorites. On our Panasonic DMP-DB30 Blu-ray player, the upconverted picture looked simply marvelous when viewed from our standard vantage point of about ten feet or so.

I would be hard-pressed to tell the difference between the faux high definition and the genuine article, although I suppose I might be able to succeed if I bothered to compare the two DVDs in rapid succession.

But does that difference make a difference? Sure, when DVD replaced VHS, you could see a vast improvement, and that’s a key reason why the former succeeded so quickly. However, unless the consumer electronics industry can knock the price of Blu-ray down to below $100 really soon — and make the prices of DVD content competitive with standard definition rather than significantly higher — I can see where Blu-ray may be one of those better ideas that ultimately failed in the marketplace.

And that would be a tragedy, even though there’s a tremendous chance it’s going to happen unless the industry acts fast.

THE FINAL WORD

The Tech Night Owl Newsletter is a weekly information service of Making The Impossible, Inc.

Publisher/Editor: Gene Steinberg
Managing Editor: Grayson Steinberg
Marketing and Public Relations: Barbara Kaplan
Worldwide Licensing and Marketing: Sharon Jarvis

Related Issues: